100pumpkins

Lease or Buy?

Posted by: 100roses on: March 4, 2009

By ERIC PETERS

Car saleman helping a couple buy a car

Car leasing is a lot like renting an apartment; you pay a monthly fee to use it but don’t own it — and aren’t making payments toward ownership. The leased vehicle remains the property of the lessor — the company that issued the lease.

As with an apartment rental contract, car leasing will have a fixed period — typically two or three years. You’re obliged to make monthly payments for the length of the contract. While you can get out of the lease before then if you want to, there will typically be extra costs — for example, an “early termination charge” — typically spelled out in the car leasing contract you sign. And as is often the case with renting an apartment, you’ll likely have to put down some cash as “security deposit” at the lease inception. This money will be used to pay for any damages to the vehicle — such as door dings, stains on the seats, any needed service work, etc. — when you return it at the end of the car leasing term.

Best Deals of the Month

woman waving keys in car

Save big with the latest incentives:

A big advantage of car leasing is flexibility. You aren’t making a long-term commitment. Typically, car leasing is for a relatively short period, 2-3 years being the norm. The average new car loan, on the other hand, is five years. When the lease period is up, you can simply bring the car back and walk away. Or you can buy it if you like by paying off the remaining balance — called the “residual value” — which you’ll negotiate in advance at the time of lease inception.

Or go shopping for a new car — or no car at all.

You have many choices.

Also, since you are only renting the car, your total cash outlay should be less. You won’t have to make as large a down payment (a security deposit and the first month’s payment are the typical initial out-of-pocket fees associate with car leasing) as you would if you were buying. And monthly lease payments are almost always less than payments would be if you bought the car. That means you’ll have more money left over to spend on other things.

Get a Free Price Quote
Or, if you prefer, you can “afford” to drive a more expensive car when you lease, since the monthly payments will be comparatively lower. This is one of the biggest single attractions of car leasing for many people. A car (or truck) that might cost you $500-$600 per month to buy might cost $100 per month less with car leasing.

Another nice thing about car leasing is that you’re always driving a new or nearly new vehicle. And of course you don’t have to worry about the potentially expensive repair and/or maintenance problems that inevitably crop up as a car ages — and gets out of warranty. The leased car will typically be under factory warranty for the duration of the lease — and car leasing contracts often have add-on provisos that cover routine maintenance, such as oil changes, etc.

Car leasing may also have tax advantages for you — but this is something you’ll have to ask your accountant about. In the past, most people who did car leasing were those who used their vehicle for business, such as realtors — and who therefore could claim deductions for car leasing not available to those who purchased them outright.

Car leasing had the additional attraction of freeing up assets for investments and so on that would otherwise be locked into a depreciating asset — the person’s car or truck.

There are downsides to car leasing, of course. Since you’re only making what amount to rental payments each month, you won’t have anything tangible to show for your money at the end of the lease. If you spend, say, $12,000 on car leasing payments (about $450 per month) over two years, that money is gone forever.

A person who buys his vehicle, on the other hand, has the comfort of knowing that one day, it will be “paid for” and — assuming it is still in good shape at that point — will provide “free transportation” until it breaks down or the owner decides to get rid of it.

In addition, a person who owns his car has equity (cash value) in the car or truck. Even though it will continue to depreciate with each passing year, so long as it’s still serviceable transportation, it will always be worth something. That value can be used as a trade-in; or the vehicle can be sold privately to help raise money to pay for a new one — or for some other need.

The person who opts for car leasing must start from scratch every time.

There’s also the mileage issue. If you decide on car leasing, your contract will typically stipulate the maximum number of miles you’re allowed before the end of the lease. If you exceed that figure, it can get expensive. Per-mile charges over the stated maximum listed in the car leasing contract are often exorbitant — so if you drive more than the allowed miles in the contract annually, leasing could turn out to be more expensive then you thought.

The person who owns his car, meanwhile, can drive it as much as he wants, and do pretty much whatever he feels like with it, too. He can swap out the stereo, add different wheels and tires, change the exhaust system — whatever. Do this with a leased car and you’ll have to pay whatever if takes to put the car back the way it was. If you own your vehicle, the inevitable door dings and dents — as well as coffee stains on the seat — can also be shrugged off.

People who lease their vehicles, on the other hand, can expect to be charged for every nick, tear or spill at the end of the lease. The cost of these repairs will be deducted from the security deposit.

Car leasing is also more complex than buying so always closely read — and be sure you understand — every proviso of the lease contract before you sign. If you’re unclear about anything, get expert advice — or walk away.

Read More about Car Ownership:
- Is Your Car Loan Upside Down?
- Best Cars for First Time Buyers
- Consumer Reports Cost of Ownership Comparison

source:  AOL Autos

Fiat keeps the low-CO2 crown for second year in a row

Posted by: 100roses on: March 4, 2009

by Xavier Navarro on Mar 3rd 2009 at 5:40PM

Last year, Jato Consulting found that Fiat lineup of cars was the lowest CO2-producing line in Europe. Fiat bosses must be smiling, because the same has been found for this model year. Fiat’s cars produce an average of 137.3 g/km. This places Fiat ahead of all these guys

  • Peugeot (138.1 g/km)
  • Citroën (142.4 g/km)
  • Renault (142.7 g/km)
  • Toyota (144.9 g/km)
  • Ford (147.8 g/km)
  • Opel/Vauxhall (151.1 g/km)
  • Volkswagen (158.8 g/km)
  • BMW (160.6 g/km)
  • Mercedes (185.0 g/km)

Fiat Group is also in the pole position for automotive groups (138.4 g/km), ahead of PSA, Renault, Toyota and Hyundai. Fiat’s figure is also very close to the EU average of 130 g/km that becomes mandatory in 2015. Full press release after the jump.

[Source: Fiat]

PRESS RELEASE:

FIAT AUTOMOBILES IS EUROPEAN LEADER FOR CO2 EMISSIONS REDUCTION FOR THE SECOND YEAR RUNNING

Fiat Automobiles, one of Europe’s 10 best-selling automotive brands, has for the second year running been confirmed as having the lowest average value for CO2 emissions from vehicles sold in 2008: 133.7 g/km (137.3 g/km in 2007). This impressive result has been corroborated by JATO, a world leader in automotive advisory and research services, founded in 1984 and now operating in over 40 countries.

The bottom line shows Fiat ahead of Peugeot (138.1 g/km), Citroën (142.4 g/km), Renault (142.7 g/km), Toyota (144.9 g/km), Ford (147.8 g/km), Opel/Vauxhall (151.1 g/km), Volkswagen (158.8 g/km), BMW (160.6 g/km) and Mercedes (185.0 g/km). Fiat Group is also in pole position for groups (138.4 g/km), ahead of PSA, Renault, Toyota and Hyundai.

Lorenzo Sistino, managing director of Fiat Automobiles, says: “The result of this important analysis rewards Fiat’s ongoing quest for innovative solutions for the reduction of polluting emissions and levels of CO2. But Fiat’s commitment has always been to the public’s real needs and won’t be stopping here.

“Our aim is to reinforce our European record in emissions reduction by introducing new engines, new technologies and new applications. New engines, like those with our innovative MultiAir system will gradually be installed in all our Group cars and will enable further reductions in consumption and emissions.

“New technologies, like Start&Stop, already introduced in the Fiat 500 and soon to be seen on all our latest models, will play their part, as will new applications like eco:Drive, an innovative software developed with Microsoft, that uses a USB port from the versatile Blue&Me system to achieve analysis of the driver’s vehicle handling, thus helping to optimise behaviour in terms of consumption and emissions. Currently there are about 10,000 regular users who monitor their driving style in this way.”

Worldwide, Fiat is one of the automotive companies offering the best response in the battle to beat the environmental impact of transport. To achieve this crucial objective, Fiat provides tangible solutions that are available to everyone now. Proof lies in the models available in today’s market, in the investments made in new product development, and the schemes for research and sustainable mobility developed in partnership with public administrations.

Nor should it be overlooked that Fiat is Europe’s leader in the production of compact vehicles, which are by definition the most eco-friendly. For instance, two years ahead of the competition, the Fiat 500 and Fiat Bravo have both been introduced with Euro 5 petrol and diesel engines. And by the end of 2009, most engines in the entire range will exceed stringent Euro 5 standards.

Fiat has also recently presented two important developments: its LPG range comprising Panda, Grande Punto and Bravo models, as well as ecological developments for the 500, Croma and Bravo. In particular, the latter includes selected versions at the forefront of the international scenario, with high technological content, low consumption and CO2 emissions. This is due to the application of specific systems like the innovative eco:Drive, the new Start&Stop – developed by Engineering & Design and FPT, with input from supplier partners like Bosch and Magneti Marelli – and special eco packs that include low rolling resistance tyres, low viscosity oils, aerodynamic packages and modified gearboxes.

Moreover, Fiat was the creator of MultiJet technology that drives all new generation diesel engines, as well as being the world leader of the OEM methane vehicle market. Fiat believes that methane engines are the most appropriate technological choice for dealing with pollution issues in urban areas. This is because the use of methane is a step in the right direction for environmental benefits (approximately a 23 per cent reduction in CO2 emissions and practically zero for PM emissions), but also in terms of cost efficiency. Fiat is a leader in this technology and the first manufacturer to offer an eco line – Natural Power – with an extensive range of dual-fuel vehicles using petrol and methane. These are able to meet the mobility demands of a large category of users, including the commercial vehicle sector.

Lastly, aside from its research into alternative fuels, Fiat has been downsizing diesel and petrol engines for some time, as can be seen with the new 1.4 T-Jet and 1.6 MultiJet families. In particular, the application of a state-of-the-art turbo compressor combined with reduced engine size means that performance comparable to or better than substantially larger engines can be achieved with significantly lower emissions and consumption.

source:  AOL Auto, Autoblog Green

“very far away”

Posted by: 100roses on: March 4, 2009

by Jeremy Korzeniewski on Mar 3rd 2009 at 6:32PM Green

According to VW CEO Martin Winterkorn, we’d better get used to the sound of a rumbling internal combustion engine churning away in our automobiles, ingesting dead dinos as they continue to be the dominate source of power for our automobiles for at least the next 15-20 years. The German automaker has big plans to invest in technologies to reduce the consumption of fossil fuels, but most of the efficiency increases will come from refinements made to gasoline and diesel-burning powerplants.

VW is hedging its bets for the future, though, having recently partnered up with Toshiba to develop high-tech electric drive systems for future automobile applications. That’s great, but Winterkorn says their adoption is “very far away.” In the meantime (and very conveniently), Volkswagen has got some excellent diesel engines in many varying wrappers that it would be happy to sell anyone looking to decrease their daily fuel spending bills.

[Source: Automotive News - sub. req'd]

source:   AOL Autos, Autoblog
 

R&B Business: Prince Does New Deal With Target

Posted by: 100roses on: March 4, 2009

Posted Mar 3rd 2009 10:20AM

by Jawn Murray

By Jawn Murray, BlackVoices.com  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Prince

Six-time Grammy winner Prince is taking an innovative approach to making his forthcoming release available at retail.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The iconoclast has inked a new deal with Target to be the exclusive retail distributor for his three-disc set of new studio recordings.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The collection includes two original studio albums by Prince called ‘LOtUSFLOW3R’ and ‘MPLSoUND.’ The third disc is titled ‘Elixer’ and introduces the singer’s new artist, Bria Valente.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Target will bundle all three albums together in a three-disc set for only $11.98, available for purchase exclusively at the retail store and on Target.com beginning March 29.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The 50-year-old singer has taken unconventional means of releasing music over the last decade.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In 1993 after a highly publicized battle with Warner Bros. Records and Warner/Chappell Publishing, PrinceNew Prince CD changed his name to an unpronounceable symbol and was mostly called “The Artist Formerly Known as Prince.”  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In May 2000, Prince ceased using the Love Symbol name and returned to using Prince after his publishing contract with Warner/Chappell expired.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The singer’s 11 CD releases since then have been done in partnership with various record labels, his own music club and other distribution means.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Rock and Roll Hall of Fame inductee won both an Academy Award and a Golden Globe Award for “Best Original Song” in 2007 for ‘Song of the Heart’ from the animated film ‘Happy Feet.’  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BUY PRINCE’S GREATEST HITS >>>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

source:  AOL News, BlackVoices.com

New Google Ocean Takes Google Earth Beyond the “Dirt”

Posted by: 100roses on: March 3, 2009

Christine Dell’Amore
National Geographic News
February 2, 2009

Exploring the oceans no longer requires a wet suit.

Ocean in Google Earth, which launched today, builds on the free, popular 3-D mapping software Google Earth by allowing users to navigate underwater in unprecedented clarity. (See new Google Earth ocean pictures.)

New “layers” to the satellite-based software include topographic maps of the seafloor; locations of shipwrecks and algal blooms; and even maps of the tiny phytoplankton that provide the bulk of the ocean’s food chain.

Within the layers, users can explore multimedia features that combine data and maps with videos, quizzes, and other interactives. (Watch Google Earth ocean preview.)

(Related story: “Google Earth, Satellite Maps Boost Armchair Archaeology” [November 7, 2006].)

The new fish-eye view—accessible via a free upgrade—aims to provide a public platform for users to talk about the oceans, said John Hanke, director of Geo Products at Google.

“It really is a means… [of] raising geographical awareness of oceans and … the pressures that are being put on life in the ocean,” he added.

Into the Blue

The idea first came to well-known marine biologist Sylvia Earle at a conference in Madrid, Spain, a few years ago, when she addressed Hanke during a presentation.

“I just blurted it out,” Earle, a National Geographic explorer-in-residence, recalled. (National Geographic News is owned by the National Geographic Society.)

“I said, I hope someday, John, you’ll finish [Google Earth]. You’ve done a great job with the dirt, but there’s all that water out there—the world is blue.”

Seventy-two percent of the Earth is covered by oceans.

Hanke said that Earle’s comments “got under our skin—it doesn’t make sense that the information stops at the coastline.”

 

Earle, who narrates the introductory video, suggested from the start that the program go beyond maps: “You need to be able to touch and dive in and see what’s there,” she said.

The resulting product is a vibrant panorama, from videos of bluefin tuna on the hunt to quizzes about sea life—from leopard seals to nudibranchs.

(Learn about the oceans in National Geographic magazine.)

Clicking on the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean layer, for instance, combines maps of the region with videos and Web links showing reefs’ colorful denizens.

In addition to National Geographic, several well-known marine institutions and initiatives, such as the Census of Marine Life (a ten-year effort to catalog marine organisms), Scripps Institution of Oceanography, Monterey Bay Aquarium, and the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution have contributed data.

(Related: “PHOTOS: New Deep-Sea Species Revealed by Marine Census” [November 10, 2008].)

Why the Ocean Matters

For Earle, Google Earth’s high-tech porthole to the oceans has an urgent import: The seas’ health is declining, and less than one percent of the world’s marine waters are protected.

“This is another major breakthrough in showing the people of the world why the ocean matters,” Earle said. (Get 50 ways to save the oceans from the National Geographic’s Green Guide.)

For instance, “the ocean provides the oxygen we breathe, much of the food the world eats, and drives the climate we need to survive—but it is still largely a mystery,” Tom McCann, spokesperson for the nonprofit organization Ocean Conservancy, said in an email.

“We hope the addition of Ocean in Google Earth will inspire more people to explore the seas they depend on every day,” added McCann, whose organization has provided Google data about marine reserves in the Pacific Ocean.

(Quiz: test your oceans IQ.)

The new program will also make on-the-ground conservation work easier, added Enric Sala, a marine ecologist and National Geographic fellow.

“It allows us to [get] critical information … in almost real time, in a way that is so much more exciting than dry written reports,” Sala said.

“We are now using a jet instead of a bicycle. …”

source:  http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/02/090202-google-oceans-missions.html

Obama proposes new wireless-spectrum fee

Posted by: 100roses on: March 3, 2009

Obama tech
February 26, 2009 3:08 PM PST

Faced with a whopping $1.7 trillion deficit, President Obama is proposing tacking on a spectrum license fee to wireless operators to help generate revenue for the government.

The Obama administration’s proposal was loosely outlined in the new budget plan for 2009 and 2010 submitted Thursday. In that plan, the administration proposes adding a new fee to be paid by wireless carriers that license wireless spectrum from the government.

These annual fees would start at $50 million in 2009 and jump to $200 million in 2010, Reuters reported. The fees will gradually increase over the next 10 years to $550 million per user per year, generating an estimated total of $4.8 billion over the next decade.

The proposed fees are in addition to license fees that operators have already paid the federal government as part of its wireless auctions. The Federal Communications Commission has been auctioning off wireless spectrum to phone companies and other entities since the 1990s. These auctions grant license holders exclusive rights to the spectrum in exchange for cash.

Over the years, these auctions have generated billions of dollars for the federal government. The most recent auction, which ended in March 2008, was for the 700 MHz block of spectrum that is being vacated by television broadcasters after the mandated digital TV transition. This valuable spectrum generated a record $19.6 billion.

But wireless spectrum is a limited resource. And the government is running out of airwaves to auction. In fact, the Obama administration predicts that it will only be able to generate about $4.8 billion in revenue from wireless auctions over the next 10 years.

Even though the additional fees could help the government halve the deficit by 2013 as well as help it fund several new spending initiatives, it’s likely to be met with a great deal of resistance from mobile operators.

So far, none of the big four wireless carriers in the U.S.–AT&T, Sprint Nextel, T-Mobile USA and Verizon Wireless–has been willing to comment on the proposal. And the CTIA wireless-industry association said it’s still looking into the matter.

“We are currently reviewing the details of the proposal and look forward to participating in the next stages of this issue,” CTIA said in a statement.

Previous spectrum fee proposals have been strongly opposed by the wireless industry, and there’s little reason to suggest that the industry would support them now. The big difference this time around is that a Democrat-controlled Congress could be more willing to support President Obama’s plans.

More details about the proposal are expected later this spring when the administration releases a more detailed budget package. But any changes to the fee structure would require legislation. And my guess is that the wireless industry would fight hard against it.

source:  http://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-10173072-94.html?tag=mncol

 

McDonald’s Ends Sales of Bottled PepsiCo Drinks

Posted by: 100roses on: March 3, 2009

 

By REUTERS

 

Published: February 27, 2009

The McDonald’s Corporation said that it had ended test sales of bottled beverages from PepsiCo in its eateries, a victory for the chain’s fountain-drink supplier, the Coca-Cola Company. McDonald’s is trying to increase drink sales and has been testing a variety of beverages in select outlets in the United States. As part of that test, it sold Mountain Dew and Gatorade drinks from PepsiCo. A PepsiCo spokesman was not immediately available for comment.

source:  http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/28/business/28bizbriefs-MCDONALDSEND_BRF.html?_r=1

 

Starbucks Corporation

Posted by: 100roses on: March 3, 2009

 SBUX: Nasdaq; Cyclical Consumer Goods & Services/Restaurants Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg News

After more than a decade of sensational buzz, Starbucks is struggling nationwide as it faces slowing sales growth and increased competition. The man who built the chain, Howard D. Schultz, has retaken the reins in an effort to revive it. Mr. Schultz has said he wants to refocus on the “customer experience,” recapturing some of the magic of the chain’s early years, when employees — who had heard the term barista before Starbucks came along? — made the drinks by hand and customers were excited by top-notch coffee. Read More… Mr. Schultz faces a difficult task: He has to slow down the company to make stores feel more like hip neighborhood coffeehouses while also delivering the steady growth that investors have come to expect from Starbucks. It was not too long ago that the arrival of a Starbucks was a major event, a recognition that a town or neighborhood was worthy of the chic Seattle-based chain. But in the last five years, every street corner, airport concourse and roadside rest stop in America seemed to attract a Starbucks. As the company grew and customer traffic increased, Starbucks expanded its food offerings while introducing efficiencies like those automated espresso machines. Gradually, complaints surfaced that Starbucks felt more like a fast-food restaurant than a coffeehouse. In five years, Starbucks nearly tripled the number of stores worldwide, from 5,886 in 2002 to 15,011 in 2007. But those were headier times. Now Starbucks finds itself in an economic climate that has most people reassessing their daily spending habits on luxury items. The company’s revenues and profit are tumbling as a result. It earned $316 million in profit on $10 billion in revenue for 2008. Starbucks has been hurt by rising costs, the cannibalizing effects of years of overexpansion, and stiff competition in espresso drinks from the likes of McDonald’s and Dunkin’ Donuts. In the summer of 2007, its customer traffic declined for the first time since the company went public, sending the stock tumbling. By the end of its fiscal 2008, Starbucks stock, once seemingly invincible, had declined by over 50 percent. In January 2008, Starbucks ousted its chief executive, James L. Donald, and brought back Mr. Schultz to try to invigorate the company. Later in the year, Mr. Schultz announced that would lay off 1,000 employees and close 600 underperforming locations in the United States, while scaling back the rate of store openings domestically. At the same time, Starbucks will move more aggressively to open stores overseas, where business remains robust. It has also introduced new discount programs like its $25 Gold Card, which offers 10 percent off on all items. — Nov. 11, 2008

source:  http://topics.nytimes.com/topics/news/business/companies/starbucks_corporation/index.html

Determined Obama vows to renew US

Posted by: 100roses on: February 25, 2009

US President Barack Obama has addressed a joint session of Congress for the first time, warning that the nation faces a “day of reckoning”.

US President Barack Obama addresses Congress

Barack Obama delivers an address to a joint session of Congress, 24 February 2009

Stressing the severity of the economic crisis, Mr Obama told lawmakers the US would emerge stronger when it ended.

“We will rebuild, we will recover,” Mr Obama said, adding: “Now is the time to act boldly and wisely.”

Republicans said Mr Obama’s plans were “wasteful”, saying they spent “money we do not have on things we do not need”.

Mr Obama has seen Congress pass a $787bn (£545bn) economic stimulus plan and is preparing to announce a budget.

Delivering a televised rebuttal shortly after Mr Obama spoke, Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal said Republicans opposed the view that the way to strengthen the country was to strengthen government.

In his speech to the joint session of the House of Representatives and the Senate, Mr Obama emphasised that his hard-fought stimulus bill – which includes efforts to save or create 3.5m jobs – will help restore growth.

This is America. We don’t do what’s easy. We do what is necessary and move this country forward
Barack Obama
US President

 

An era of extravagant spending must end, the president told Congress.

Outlining what he saw as the roots of the economic crisis, Mr Obama told congressmen that short-term gains had been prized over long-term prosperity.

“And all the while, critical debates and difficult decisions were put off for some other time on some other day,” he said.

“Well, that day of reckoning has arrived, and the time to take charge of our future is here.”

Domestic goals

He praised Congress for passing the economic stimulus plan, which he said would create millions of jobs and revitalise the US, and deliver a tax cut to 95% of Americans by 1 April.

The package, signed after compromises debated in both houses, was designed to channel federal money toward infrastructure projects, health care, renewable energy development and conservation programmes.

The first month of Mr Obama’s presidency has also included a banking bail-out worth at least $1.5 trillion (£1.02 trillion) and a plan to support “responsible homeowners” struggling with mortgages.

He won a standing ovation when he told his audience that banks and bankers taking public money would be fully accountable, vowing that tax dollars would not be frittered away.

“Those days are over,” Mr Obama said. “It’s not about helping banks, it’s about helping people.”

The speech came days before the unveiling of the administration’s first budget, with sights set on reducing the giant US deficit, currently standing at about $1 trillion.

Mr Obama said the vast deficit and the “crushing cost” of healthcare made the need for wide-ranging reform more urgent than ever, and he pledged to reform and improve the nation’s schooling and boost the numbers of students in higher education.

He restated a pledge made on Monday to cut the deficit in half by the end of his first term, and said officials had begun to go “line by line” through the federal budget “to eliminate wasteful and ineffective” schemes.

Foreign fields

The BBC’s Kevin Connolly in Washington says Barack Obama delivered a powerful address, offering more hope than in recent major speeches.

The address looks and feels like the State of the Union speech which normally come at about this point in the political calendar.

But because Mr Obama is new to office, and therefore not in a position to take responsibility for the triumphs and disasters of 2008, this was billed simply as an address to the joint houses, our correspondent adds.

While much of his speech focused on domestic issues, Mr Obama also touched on the key foreign policy issues facing his administration.

Reviews of US involvement in both Iraq and Afghanistan were currently ongoing, the president said, and would soon deliver their results.

The terrorists – in Obamaland – are lumped in with other problems the world faces: global warming, disease, etc
Justin Webb
BBC North America Editor

He promised a “new and comprehensive strategy” for Afghanistan and Pakistan aimed at defeating al-Qaeda and defeating extremism.

And while he paid tribute to US troops serving overseas, there was no detailed reference to plans for Iraq, or any reference to Iran, whose nuclear programme is viewed by many analysts as a major foreign policy challenge for the new president.

The speech came as some of the first polls analysing Mr Obama’s level of public support indicated that voters still strongly back the man they chose for office fewer than four months ago.

A New York Times/CBS News poll published ahead of his speech put the president’s approval rating at 63%, with a Washington Post/ABC News survey showing 68% support.

The presidential address – which began late and lasted a little over 45 minutes – was followed by a response from Republican Bobby Jindal.

The 37-year-old governor of Louisiana – the first Indian-American to occupy such a post – is one of the Republican Party’s rising stars, and is tipped as a likely contender for the White House four years from now.

He was highly critical of Mr Obama’s plans, dismissing the stimulus plan and banking bail-out as Washington waste.

“The way to lead is not to raise taxes and put more money and power in hands of Washington politicians,” he said.

 

REACTION TO PRESIDENT OBAMA’S SPEECH

The economic crisis requires immediate, bold and comprehensive action. And on Tuesday night, Mr Obama displayed the ambition and the sweeping vision that won him the White House – and that this crisis demands. It was a refreshing change after his less-than-forceful handling of the stimulus bill.

Editorial,

The speech capped an often frantic start for his administration that has surpassed even the first month of FDR’s New Deal. And for Obama, it was a chance to step back and spell out the full scope of the challenges facing the nation — and connect the dots of his economic plan for moving ahead.

David Rogers,

 

Well, this was an extraordinary speech. We certainly do have a new president. My own reaction was that Obama looked stronger and more confident tonight than I have ever seen him before – and he has never lacked for confidence in the past.

Robert G Kaiser,

 

Well, the problem for Republicans is that, (a), Americans support Obama’s tax plan as laid out during the campaign. (b), Americans are demanding more government involvement. Remember October 2008: the specter of socialism, as dredged up by the GOP, failed. And the problems weren’t as bad as they are now!

Marc Ambinder,

 

 

 

Published: 2009/02/25 05:41:54 GMT

© BBC MMIX

Print Sponsor

Eight Reasons Bank of America Is Going to $20

Posted by: 100roses on: February 24, 2009

Jason Schwarz

We are experiencing an overreaction of historic proportions when it comes to the financial sector and specifically Bank of America (BAC). In case you haven’t noticed, these extreme overreactions are becoming the norm; a thorough understanding of the reasons for the overreaction are paramount to generating great investment returns. The market has gotten Bank of America terribly wrong in the short run as the ‘cloud of uncertainty’ has collided with the ‘sea of negativity’. Governmental uncertainty combined with the market’s negativity are the contributing factors for Bank of America plunging below $4 a share. After riding Apple (AAPL) calls to triple digit gains in 2007, and then riding oil puts to triple digit gains in 2008, I am making Bank of America my #1 holding for 2009. By next year this stock will be back to $20 a share. Consider the following:

1) The market is running wild on some hyped up article written in the Financial Times that claims Obama is considering nationalizing the banks. If you actually read the article you’ll notice the anti-American sentiment at the very beginning when they say that ‘nationalization has long been regarded in the U.S. as a folly of Europeans…’ Ok, I get it, Europe has been right all along. Whatever. Obama’s true feelings on nationalization came out in his ABC interview after Geither’s banking speech when he laughed out loud and said, “Sweden had like five banks. We’ve got thousands of banks…managing and overseeing anything of that scale…wouldn’t make sense. And we also have different traditions in this country.”

2) Obama understands that the markets will determine his success. He has been very upfront in his stance that the success of this financial plan will depend on how the markets respond over the next few months. The idea of killing off current shareholders and taking Bank of America off the market during a nationalization phase is unthinkable.

3) Tim Geithner does not believe in nationalizing the banks either. Mr Geithner last week said: “Governments are terrible managers of bad assets.” He went on to outline a plan that will seek help from the private sector, will maintain a market for these toxic assets, and will increase transparency. Nationalization accomplishes none of these three.

4) Any talk of banks would be incomplete without the opinion of the woman who has been right all along, Meredith Whitney. Obviously she is not high on the banks but in her interview on CNBC Wednesday she was very careful not to include Bank of America in her criticisms. She told investors to sell Citigroup (C) but would not mention Bank of America. She also is against nationalization and advocates the use of non punitive capital to strengthen the system. Maria Bartiromo wanted to get her to say ’sell all the big banks’ but she never said it, in fact she mentioned that JP Morgan (JPM) would be a survivor as they are well capitalized. I believe Bank of America is in a similar position.
5) Earlier this week, Bank of America actually paid back $402 million in a TARP dividend payment to the U.S. government. If this doesn’t show their commitment to repaying taxpayers I don’t know what would. CEO Ken Lewis has mentioned that his company will not need to borrow any more funds, that they are well capitalized and that his company had a good January. They were led by Countrywide who he described as being ‘on fire’ because of the boom in refinances.
6) The Fed will be purchasing $500 billion of mortgage backed securities over the next six months. Bank of America took one for the team by going through with their purchase of Merrill Lynch even when they had second thoughts, they did it at the request of the Fed and the Treasury who worried about a systematic risk if the deal were to fail. The Fed will be as friendly as possible to Bank of America in this repurchase program.
7) Bank of America will be the undisputed leader of the new economy. I’m excited about being invested in the largest retail brokerage (Merrill Lynch), the largest mortgage lender (Countrywide), and a bank who has been profitable for 17 years in a row, including 2008 (Bank of America).
8) Huge insider buying.
See you at $20.
Disclosure: Long 2011 $5 BAC Calls.